In complex factual situations such as those which occurred in the former Yugoslavia. The distinction is also likely to cause procedural difficulties for the International Criminal Court when it is prosecuting war crimes ![]() However, recent developments in treaty law, particularly weapons treaties, indicate a movement away from this distinction. This distinction arises from the history of the development of international humanitarian law culminating in the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977Īdditional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions. [This article argues that the distinction between international and non-international armed conflict should be removed from the warĬrimes provisions of the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. REMOVING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT IN THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Removing Armed Conflict Distinctions DEIDRE WILLMOTT B Distinction between ‘Other Serious Violations’ in International Armed Conflict and Non-International Armed Conflict.A Distinction between ‘Grave Breaches’ and.IV PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT.III THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.REMOVING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NON-INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT IN THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ![]() ![]() | Feedback Melbourne Journal of International Law Willmott, Deidre - "Removing the Distinction Between International and Non-International Armed Conflict in the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court" MelbJlIntLaw 8 (2004) 5(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law 196
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |